Liberty and Freedom
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
AFFIDAVIT, & DEMAND FOR CHARGING AFFIDAVITS
State of Nebraska )
) ss.
County of _______________ )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel Accusers Unknown (Plaintiff) vs. DAVID LEE KLEENSANG and BERNITA MARGARET KLEENSANG (Purportedly/accused) (Defendants) |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
Case No. 8:12CR 56 Case No. 8:12CR 56-LSC-FG3 Affidavit, & Demand for Charging AffidavitsPoints of Law 18 USC §§ 3, 4, 241, 242, 1001, 1621, & 1622
The United States Constitution (Supreme Law of the Land) Article IV § I, Amendment 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, & 14
42 USC § 1986
|
The Constitution for the United States of America, the Supreme Law of the Land, Amendment 4 guarantees to us that no warrant shall be issued, but on probable cause sworn on Oath or Affirmation, and at Amendment 6 guarantees to us to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; and the right to face and to challenge the accusing witnesses against us, and to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in our favor; at the 13th Amendment guarantees to us that we will not be subjected to involuntary servitude or incarceration unless and until having been dully convicted of a crime.
Affidavit
We, David Lee Kleensang and Bernita Margaret Kleensang depose and say as follows:
1) We have not received in this U.S. District Court Case No. 8:12CR 56-LSC-FG3 any charging Affidavits sworn to be true, correct, complete, and not misleading from any accusing party with respect to any charge or accusation against us.
2) We are not being given a full trial, which includes providing to us an Affidavit statement of the Nature and Cause of the accusations purportedly against us, including the right to know the identity of, and to face, and to be able to challenge our accusers under oath on the witness stand.
THERFORE:
1) We demand Charging Affidavits sworn to be True, Correct, Complete, and not misleading from each and every Accusing party with respect to each and every charge and accusation.
2) We demand the Constitutionally Lawfully completion of our trial including the opportunity to examine accusers under oath on the witness stand, and without the constant interference of the Judge and/or objections by the Prosecution.
We, David Lee Kleensang, and Bernita Margaret Kleensang certify under our own Commercial Liability that we have read the AFFIDAVIT, & DEMAND FOR CHARGING AFFIDAVITS and know the content thereof, and that, to the best of our knowledge and belief it is True, Correct, Complete, and not misleading, the Truth, the Whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth.
Executed this _____ day of __________________, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve.
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
(Signatures of Affiants)
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this __________day of __________________,
in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve by_______________________________________
and _____________________________________
(Print Affiants’ Names)
____ Personally Known
____ Produced Identification
Type and # of ID______________________
NOTICE: All response correspondence must be sent to David Lee Kleensang and Bernita Margaret Kleensang.
c/o Notary Acceptor, c/o 8035 Black Hawk Road, Black Hawk, South Dakota 57718
_______________________________
(Signature of Notary)
(Seal) ________________________________
(Name of Notary Typed, Stamped, or Printed)
Notary Public, State of __________________
The Certifying Notary is an independent contractor and not a party to this claim. In fact the Certifying Notary is a Federal Witness Pursuant to TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 73, SEC. 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. The Certifying Notary also performs the functions of a quasi-Postal Inspector under the Homeland Security Act by being compelled to report any violations of the U.S. Postal regulations as an Officer of the Executive Department. Intimidating a Notary Public under Color of Law is a violation of Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 242, titled “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law,” which primarily governs police misconduct investigations. This Statute makes it a crime for any person acting under the Color of Law to willfully deprive any individual residing in the United States and/or United States of America those rights protected by the Constitution and U.S. laws.
Tags:
© 2013 Created by Gene Clem.
Powered by