Liberty and Freedom
Twin Cities Area
Information
Discussion Forum
CIA Director Nominee is Muslim
Started by Jennifer Groves. Last reply by David Walberg Feb 11. 1 Reply 1 Like
Comment Wall
Comment
-
Comment by albaby on January 8, 2012 at 12:17pm -
I thought iy was hilarious the way Paul skirted the question about his newsletters racial statements by saying that his wanting to legalize drugs was because drug laws are disproportionately hard on blacks and that proves he is not a racist. I almost choked!
It reminded me of a post where someone was against building more prisons or privatizing them was because judges would try to fill them. IOW-he was suggesting that prisons are the cause of c rime..
-
Comment by albaby on January 8, 2012 at 12:06pm
-
If yhou want to learn more about America's non-interventionist policy, try this link. It's 19 printed pages long and not a blurb from a candidates website. This is not for those who need everything condensed into a Readers Digest version.
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/12/the-myth-of-isolat...
-
Comment by Janet Blazen on January 8, 2012 at 11:52am -
At the Tea Party meeting the other night, Sherry brought up the NDAA law and if anyone had anything to say about it.............I told the group it was a little late for that wasn't it ?
It's law now !
I tried to warn the Tea Party of this up coming bill a LONG TIME AGO ( so that they could call their reps.) and was told that I was a, " crazy conspiracy theory nut job and to look up the word, "par-in-oid."
Would anywone like to take credit for this name calling now ?
I also asked the members who were there to PLEASE pay some attention in the future to warnings so that some of these issues can possibly be addressed BEFORE it's to late instead of making fun of and attacking the "messenger" !
-
Comment by albaby on January 8, 2012 at 11:45am
-
Want to know a little more about Michael Scheuer? Osama Bin Laden recommeded his book,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Scheuer
In a videotape released around September 7, 2007, Osama bin Laden stated, "If you want to understand what's going on and if you would like to get to know some of the reasons for your losing the war against us, then read the book of Michael Scheuer."[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Scheuer
He is right about this: from his webpage.
"For a long time, it struck me as quite egotistical — and probably
arrogant — to think that I had anything to say about contemporary
U.S. foreign policy and the perils of its relentless interventionism
that would merit a website of my own. And to tell the truth, I still
have doubts that (a) I have much to say that is insightful on the issue
and (b) that anyone will much care what I have to say.True that.
-
Comment by Janet Blazen on January 8, 2012 at 11:31am
-
Albaby, You were trying to make a point that would connect Ron Paul folks with this list and I was just letting you know that I only knew of a few of these people.............Just because they are on this list does NOT mean a Ron Paul person agrees with all of them them !........................Even a broked clock is correct 2 times a day !
There are SOME Americans who think the NDAA is a good thing (which takes more of the CONSTITUTION away from us, Does that mean that they agree with Hitler ?
(Well, probably yes ) "just sayin "
-
Comment by albaby on January 8, 2012 at 11:16am
-
Janet-had you opened the link I provided ands read it, you would have seen where the names came from, but as is typicalm of Paul supporters, they have their minds made up and won't let things like facts get in the way. Just like Ron Paul.
What's the point? Just as as Ron Paul did yesterday in the debates, you can always find a liberal site that will agree with you or diss a conservative candidate. He didn't mention the site, but Santorum knew what he was talking about. It's called C.R.E.W.
It's has Ethics in it's name, Just like Nancy Pelosi's " most ethical Congress you have ever seen and the Congressional Ethics Committee.
-
Comment by Janet Blazen on January 8, 2012 at 11:14am
-
Albaby, You are right !..............Paul will probably NOT get 68.5 %.............Because he is NOT one of the Elite who belongs to the CFR (who believes in and promotes NWO...) These CFR members are "PUT" in office in advance..........That's why they all stick together and make fun of those who DON'T belong to their little click......Ever noticed how The Clinton's & the Bush's are so chummy ? ( look up CFR members past + current) Candidates have been known to take their names off this list until AFTER the election and put it back on after their stint as president.........
-
Comment by Janet Blazen on January 8, 2012 at 11:06am
-
Todd, Oh my gosh !!!!!!!!!!! THE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES ?? That IS a good news source !
RON PAUL....is NOT racist !
RON PAUL....is NOT a chickenhawk !
RON PAUL....does NOT vote for "every bill just to look busy !"
RON PAUL...Belives in FREEDOM & RIGHTS for "all" Americans !
RON PAUL...Supports our CONSTITUTION 100%
RON PAUL...Never changes his stance on issues JUST to get votes !
RON PAUL...(is not to old) He rides his bike 20 miles a few times per week & his B.P. & heart rate are excellent !
RON PAUL....Gets more support from the military than all other candidates put together.........
RON PAUL...(says the same thing Israel says) Israel does NOT want us protecting them !
RON PAUL...is kind, truthful, thoughtful, served his country, served his district, served his fellow man, does NOT BELONG TO CFR, ( this is a "big" one and most people don't even know what CFR is ?)
AS A RON PAUL SUPPORTER..........I have looked at "all" evidence on "all" sides and will continue to look at this evidence until I pull the lever at the voting booth !.......I don't vote because someone is cute, handsome, has good hair, or a suit that "fits", or can tell the best lies, or someone who changes his mind "just" because he will get more votes.........
If someone can point out some faults in RON PAUL and prove them, I WILL look at it sincerely.............
Thank You......
-
Comment by albaby on January 8, 2012 at 11:05am
-
Let's see if Ron Paul gets 68.5% of the NH vote. Thsese are not internet polls. National polls
Poll Date Sample Romney Gingrich Paul Santorum Perry Huntsman Spread RCP Average 12/14 - 1/6 -- 27.2 22.2 12.6 9.6 5.8 2.0 Romney +5.0 Gallup Tracking 1/2 - 1/6 1000 RV 29 17 12 16 6 1 Romney +12 Rasmussen Reports 1/4 - 1/4 1000 LV 29 16 12 21 4 4 Romney +8 CNN/Opinion Research 12/16 - 12/18 436 A 28 28 14 4 7 2 Tie ABC News/Wash Post 12/15 - 12/18 RV 30 30 15 4 6 2 Tie CBS News 12/14 - 12/18 291 RV 20 20 10 3 6 1 Tie See All 2012 Republican Presidential Nomination Polling Data
New Hampshire polls
Poll Date Sample Romney Paul Santorum Huntsman Gingrich Perry Spread RCP Average 1/2 - 1/7 -- 40.2 20.8 10.6 9.4 8.6 1.0 Romney +19.4 Suffolk/7News Tracking 1/6 - 1/7 500 LV 35 20 8 11 9 1 Romney +15 Rasmussen Reports 1/5 - 1/5 750 LV 42 18 13 12 8 1 Romney +24 NBC News/Marist 1/4 - 1/5 711 LV 42 22 13 9 9 1 Romney +20 WMUR/UNH 1/2 - 1/5 631 LV 44 20 8 7 8 1 Romney +24 Wash Times/JZ Analytics 1/4 - 1/4 498 LV 38 24 11 8 9 1 Romney +14
-
Comment by Todd Erb on January 8, 2012 at 9:36am -
From International Business Times website
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who won the New Hampshire 2012 Republican Debate?Mitt Romney 17.7% (452 votes)
Ron Paul 66.35% (1,694 votes)
Newt Gingrich 6.15% (157 votes)
Jon Huntsman 4.74% (121 votes)
Rick Perry 1.02% (26 votes)
Rick Santorum 4.03% (103 votes)Total Votes: 2,553
--------------------------------------------------------
Who do you support for the 2012 Republican nomination race?Mitt Romney 15.05% (278 votes)
Ron Paul 68.49% (1,265 votes)
Newt Gingrich 6.82% (126 votes)
Jon Huntsman 4.49% (83 votes)
Rick Perry 1.41% (26 votes)
Rick Santorum 3.74% (69 votes)Total Votes: 1,847
------------------------------------------------------------------http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/278278/20120107/who-won-new-hampshi...
© 2013 Created by Gene Clem.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Twin Cities Area to add comments!