Southwest MI Patriots

Liberty and Freedom

"U.S. Soldiers Forced to Wear UN Logo?"

 

“I took an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic. My Army enlistment oath is to the Constitution. I cannot find any reference to the United Nations in that oath.”

    ~ "U.S. Army Specialist E-4 Michael G. New, a medic in the Third Infantry Division who was drummed out of the military because he refused to wear the uniform of the United Nations."

 

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/u-s-soliders-forced-to-wear-u-n-logo/

 

“When American soldiers were killed over Iraq,” she [Phyllis Schlafly] wrote, “Vice President Al Gore told the widows and orphans of those men that ‘they died in the service of the United Nations.’ That wasn’t a slip of the tongue; his words reveal the Clinton administration’s plan to use our armed forces as U.N. mercenaries all over the world at the whim of U.N. bureaucrats.”

 

" . . . prosecutors in the Clinton administration withheld exculpatory evidence, deceived a judge in the case and misled defense counsel to stamp out what could have been a rebellion against illegal orders to serve under the banner of the international political group.

 

"That’s the very assertion in a new and unprecedented appeal to the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals in a “Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Error.”

 

"It was through Presidential Decision Directive [executive order] 25 that Clinton ordered American troops to submit to the command of multilateral “peace” operations around the world.

 

" . . . what fell out of the process was the effort to obtain permission from Congress."

 

Executive orders should be illegal.

 

Views: 35

Tags: america, american, army, executive, force, logo, military, nations, new, order, More…soldiers, u.s., un, united, wear

Comment

You need to be a member of Southwest MI Patriots to add comments!

Join Southwest MI Patriots

Comment by Kenneth David on June 1, 2012 at 9:42pm

What a bunch of BS

Comment by Jennifer Groves on May 25, 2012 at 6:06pm

I think that's the difference-- defending UN missions = destruction of the Constitution. At this point, our government is the enemy of our country. So soldiers are forced to choose which they will uphold--President's order OR the Constitution. Sadly, they are not compatible.

Comment by Gordie WH on May 25, 2012 at 4:37pm

The Oath of Enlistment also says, “….I will obey the orders of the President of the United Stated and the orders of the officers appointed over me…”. If an enlistee is not willing to abide by this oath, they shouldn’t swear to it.
As a spook for the old Army Security Agency, I engaged in activities that were illegal by international treaty and law. Why? To “support and defend the Constitution of the United States”. Once in a fire fight however, the oath is just a bunch of fancy words.

© 2013   Created by Gene Clem.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service